perm filename MILLER.LE3[LET,JMC] blob
sn#144972 filedate 1975-02-11 generic text, type T, neo UTF8
00100 .require "let.pub" source;
00200 ∂AIL Provost William F. Miller↓Stanford University↓Stanford CA 94305∞
00300 Dear Bill:
00400
00500 Thanks for taking the time to answer my letter sent to the %2Daily%1.
00600 I am afraid I went overboard in the last couple sentences, and as a
00700 result you missed the point I was trying to make; at least your note
00800 didn't address this point.
00900
01000 In your speech at the Senate meeting and in your note you
01100 stressed that the Administration was making equal sacrifices with
01200 what the faculty was being asked to make and exemplified this by
01300 telling about the cuts in your own office. Equality of sacrifice
01400 is a reasonable criterion in the %2community%1 model of the university,
01500 but it is irrelevant in the %2purpose%1 model. In the latter case,
01600 the criterion is what ratio of administrative and service expenditures
01700 to direct academic expenditures best serves the purpose of the university -
01800 the creation and propogation of knowledge.
01900
02000 This issue, which was addressed by Pittendrigh's motion, might
02100 be tackled in several ways:
02200
02300 1. An analytic study designed to show that each administrative
02400 and service personnel increase has contributed as much as an equivalent
02500 academic increase. To be convincing this would have to go into some
02600 detail.
02700 It might also be shown that certain increases were unavoidable
02800 even though they were not cost-effective.
02900
03000 2. A comparison with (say) five other schools in (say) ten
03100 areas of expenditure showing that they had all suffered comparable
03200 increases in costs and had comparable costs in terms of the functions
03300 performed.
03400
03500 3. A comparison with Stanford in (say) 1960 in (say) ten
03600 areas of expenditure explaining the increases in each area.
03700
03800 Probably a combination of these approaches would be most convincing.
03900
04000 You are right that I haven't studied many documents; I did
04100 study the budget document distributed last year quite carefully and
04200 concluded that there was no way to answer my questions as to whether
04300 money was being effectively spent on the basi of it. The list of
04400 administrative and service budget increases and the casual way
04500 in which they were explained led me to the conclusion that there
04600 was still no effectivee damper on administrative personnel incrses.
04700 Don Knuth remarked that increases in number of faculty have to
04800 be justified much more carefully than administrative personnel
04900 increases.
05000
05100 The area in which I have the most personal knowledge is computing.
05200 I have long since given up hope that Stanford will buy a PDP-10
05300 for interactive computing, even though I still think it more
05400 cost-effective than the IBM alternatives. I have also given up
05500 criticizing the the 360/67 operation, although all the weaknesses
05600 I previously criticized are still present. However, the administrative
05700 computing monster, against which I railed in vain in 1971, has gotten
05800 %2three times as big%1 as it was, and the main thing that has permitted
05900 this is the formation of SCIP, which has permitted it to hide its
06000 costs.